Contract
Website Migration and Managed Services — Drupal Multi-Site Environment
RFP / procurement evidence involving Drupal. First observed 4 Sept 2026; the response opens on ungm.org.
- Technology
- Drupal
- Budget
- Not provided by source
- Work format
- RFP / procurement
- Role family
- Software specialist
- Seniority
- Level not stated
- Observed
- 4 Sept 202612 days old
- Response destination
- ungm.org
What this signal says
Leadiy recorded “Website Migration and Managed Services — Drupal Multi-Site Environment” as a rfp / procurement signal, not as a copied job-board article. The public page keeps only the facts needed to understand the commercial request: the role or outcome, normalized technologies, engagement format, stated budget, observation time and the exact destination for a response. Contact names, email addresses, outreach drafts, private notes and the imported source row stay outside this page. The useful question is therefore narrow: what kind of software demand is visible here, and what should a supplier verify before deciding to respond?
How the technology was normalized
The controlled technology reading for this record is Drupal. That label is derived from explicit terms in the role, primary technology and stack fields; it is not inferred from the buyer’s identity or from private contact context. Normalization folds common spelling and naming variants into one catalog so this page can be compared with other records. A combination tag appears only when every required part of that combination is detected. The result is a search aid, not a guarantee that every named tool is equally central to the delivery scope.
Commercial format
Leadiy reads the buying motion as RFP / procurement. This matters because the response shape for a deliverable, contractor seat, formal proposal and employment application is not interchangeable. The category is a classifier output rather than a legal characterization, and the original post wins if its terms change. The available duration wording is “Migration project plus managed services; exact term/hours in WAVE package.” Work-location context is recorded as “Supplier submission through IOM WAVE; international/Ukraine eligibility must be confirmed in the official package.”
Reading the budget
No budget value was supplied in the imported source record. The page labels this plainly as “Budget not provided by source” so publication status cannot be confused with compensation coverage. An absent figure is not converted into zero and is not inferred from neighbouring opportunities. The original destination remains the authority for price, salary, rate unit, fees, milestones and any later updates.
Demand context from Hiring Pulse
In the current 30-day Hiring Pulse, Drupal appears in 115 of 1254 observed opportunities (9.2%). Counts are multi-label, so one opportunity may contribute to several technology buckets. This aggregate context is intentionally bounded. The denominator is the current observed sample, technology counting overlaps, and small buckets may be suppressed. A single listing cannot establish a trend, and a technology’s share in Leadiy’s feed is not market share. The useful comparison is operational: it shows whether the normalized topic recurs among recently observed opportunities and gives the individual signal a dated reference point. Direct leads, contact data, raw source rows and private qualification notes do not enter that public calculation.
Observation and publication timing
Timing here is explicit: observed by Leadiy on 4 Sept 2026, 02:33 UTC, 11 days old at the current request, then admitted to the public catalog after 26.50 hours. The system never recomputes a shorter delay because a page is requested frequently. This is an evidence timestamp, not a promise that the source remains open, and not a reconstruction of when the buyer first posted. Visitors who need the freshest matched records use the authenticated product; the public page is intentionally the later, indexable edition.
What looks similar
To build a useful neighbourhood around this record, Leadiy compares normalized technology IDs and favours the strongest overlap among pages that have already cleared the public delay. The current result is: "Web Developer — Drupal 10/11 financial-services site", "Drupal Consultant — Acquia Cloud, USWDS and accessibility", "Drupal Developer — Senior" This method makes relationships inspectable and avoids copying descriptive text from the source. Similarity means shared technical vocabulary, nothing more. It does not assert shared ownership, equal scope, equivalent seniority or an identical application process, and it can evolve as later records become publicly eligible.
Where the response goes
The response button on this page opens UNGM / IOM at ungm.org. It leaves Leadiy and goes to the original opportunity URL; Leadiy is not the application destination and does not relay a response from this public page. The source may require its own account, profile, proposal form, geographic eligibility or platform terms. Check the destination address before entering information, and use the source’s current instructions rather than any summary here. This disclosure is intentionally repeated beside the button so the action is clear before a visitor clicks.
Public evidence versus earlier access
Leadiy sells timing, not a different truth: the same opportunities, one day earlier. Subscribers receive the fresh matched feed and private workflow before a record crosses its public time fence. The later page remains complete enough to stand alone, with provenance, classification, budget reading, aggregate context and related records. Subscription is not preferential treatment from the buyer, and it cannot guarantee availability or success. It is earlier awareness plus an operational workspace; the public catalog is the delayed evidence layer.
The same opportunities, one day earlier.
See the $39 / 30-day plan →Your response leaves Leadiy.
The button opens ungm.org. That third-party page controls login, eligibility, proposal fields, privacy and the current status of the opportunity.